000 | 01819cam a22003134a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 111031s2012 nyu b 000 0 eng | ||
010 | _a 2011042637 | ||
016 | 7 |
_a016019578 _2Uk |
|
020 |
_a9780393340730 (pbk.) : _c$17.95 |
||
020 | _a0393340732 (pbk.) | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)ocn738350223 | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aPN145 _b.D25 2012 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a808.02 _223 |
100 | 1 |
_aD'Agata, John, _d1974- |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe lifespan of a fact / _cJohn D'Agata and Jim Fingal. |
246 | 3 | _aLife span of a fact | |
246 | 1 | 4 |
_aLifespan of a fact : _bJohn D'Agata, author, Jim Final, fact-checker |
250 | _a1st ed. | ||
260 |
_aNew York, N.Y. : _bW.W. Norton, _cc2012. |
||
300 |
_a123 p. ; _c24 cm. |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references. | ||
520 | _aHow negotiable is a fact in nonfiction? In 2003, an essay by John D'Agata was rejected by the magazine that commissioned it due to factual inaccuracies. That essay--which eventually became the foundation of D'Agata's critically acclaimed About a Mountain--was accepted by another magazine, but not before they handed it to their own fact-checker, Jim Fingal. What resulted from that assignment was seven years of arguments, negotiations, and revisions as D'Agata and Fingal struggled to navigate the boundaries of literary nonfiction. What emerges is a brilliant and eye-opening meditation on the relationship between "truth" and "accuracy" and a penetrating conversation about whether it is appropriate for a writer to substitute one for the other"--P. [4] of cover. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aCreative nonfiction _xAuthorship. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aEssay _xAuthorship. |
|
700 | 1 | _aFingal, Jim. | |
906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cNFIC _n0 |
||
955 |
_brg14 2011-10-31 _irg14 2011-10-31 to CIP _axe05 2012-07-13 1 copy rec'd., to CIP ver. |
||
999 |
_c8001 _d8001 |